Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nastasja Mariana Schunk vs Emily Appleton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schunk vs Appleton analysis and find out who is favored!
Nastasja Mariana Schunk vs Emily Appleton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schunk 1 - 0 Appleton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schunk has won 49.6% of points on their second serve, while Appleton has won 47.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schunk, in recent form, has won 55.51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Appleton has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.71% and 35.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schunk has saved 57.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Appleton has saved 52.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schunk has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 27/ 16), with Appleton winning 53.97% (W/L 34/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schunk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 64/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Schunk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 12), where as Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schunk winning 1 times and Appleton being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schunk winning 2 and Appleton winning 0. The last match between Schunk and Appleton was at the W75 Altenkirchen, 14-02-2024, First, Carpet with Nastasja Mariana Schunk getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schunk and Appleton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schunk winning 0 times and Appleton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schunk winning 0, and Appleton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schunk has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.84 while Appleton has played against players with an average rank of 280.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schunk has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Appleton has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schunk has converted 43.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Appleton has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
525
Rank
143
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
399
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
60% (99-67)
Career Total W/L
50% (181-179)
58% (19-14)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$105,902
Career Prize Money
$2,804
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nastasja Mariana Schunk | Emily Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (32/47) | 59% (32/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (27/32) | 63% (20/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 73% (11/15) | 55% (12/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (22/54) | 19% (9/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Emily Appleton
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nastasja Mariana Schunk | Emily Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (19/14) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (46/35) | 53% (37/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (384/330) | 50% (325/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 57% (12/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.63 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 198 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.61 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 192 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:41 | 1:27:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 293.03 | 275.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1517/2263) | 57% (1174/2046) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (965/1517) | 70% (824/1174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (370/746) | 47% (406/872) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (127/291) | 39% (93/241) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1065/2427) | 41% (907/2187) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (19/12) | 56% (18/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (7/15) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (21/15) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (21/6) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 18% (17/3) |
Nastasja Mariana Schunk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
82%
(
83 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
84 of
162)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
53%
(
41 of
78)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
39%
(
63 of
162)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
51 of
134)
150
Total Points Won
146
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
57 of
110)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
52 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
0-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Martha Matoula
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
74 of
128)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Tamara Zidansek
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Federica Di Sarra
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Arianna Zucchini
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Anne Schaefer
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Kyle S. Mcphillips
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Schunk Vs Appleton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
